Risk Management & StatisticsIntermediate

Risk of Ruin

What risk of ruin means, how risk per trade changes drawdown depth on the same trades, a worked comparison of 1% vs 5% risk, and the rules that keep it low.

Library categories

What it means

Risk of ruin is the probability of losing so much that you cannot continue (for example a 50% loss, or a level you set). It depends on expectancy, win rate, payoff and, above all, the fraction risked per trade.

Why traders use it

The same sequence of trades produces very different paths at different risk sizes. Higher risk makes both the swings and the chance of hitting the ruin level much larger, even when expectancy is positive.

Chart examples

Same trades, two risk sizes

5% per trade1% per tradeStart = 100
The made-up 30-trade sequence at 1% risk (green) and 5% risk (red) per trade, starting from 100. Larger risk means much deeper swings.Schematic diagrams drawn to explain the idea; they are not market data.

How to identify it objectively

  • 1Define ruin (for example −50%).
  • 2Estimate expectancy and the longest plausible losing streak.
  • 3Simulate many random orderings of your trades (Monte Carlo) at each risk size.
  • 4Choose a risk per trade where reaching ruin is very unlikely.

Bullish use

  • 1Risk a small fixed fraction (often 0.5–1%).
  • 2Keep it fixed through streaks.

Bearish use

  • 1Martingale (doubling after losses) increases risk of ruin sharply.
  • 2Oversized leverage turns normal streaks into ruin.

What confirms it

  • A Monte Carlo test on your own trade results.

What invalidates it

  • Sizing from available margin instead of from the stop.

How a hypothetical setup is built

Entry

Not an entry rule.

Stop

Size = (equity × risk %) ÷ stop distance.

Target

Keep the risk fraction low enough that the worst simulated streak is survivable.

A hypothetical illustration of how the concept is turned into a plan, not a recommendation. Practise it on a paper account first.

Historical testing

The diagram applies the made-up 30-trade sequence at 1% and 5% risk per trade. At 1% the low point is about −2.2%; at 5% it is about −14.9%. Here 5% ends higher, but with a longer losing streak the same sizing can be ruinous.

Limitations: when it fails

  • Risk of ruin formulas assume independent trades.
  • Real streaks can be longer than any sample.
  • Fees and slippage reduce expectancy.

Knowledge check

Pick an answer to see the explanation. Nothing is saved.

What changes risk of ruin most directly?

1. What changes risk of ruin most directly?

Martingale…

2. Martingale…

A good tool to estimate it?

3. A good tool to estimate it?

Practise it risk-free

Open the free chart, use replay to go back in time and look for this concept candle by candle with $20,000 in virtual money.